For suppliers — CFO & Owners

Card isn't expensive. It was set up wrong.

The net cost is 12–82 bps — not the 3% you're picturing — and you stop financing your buyer's receivable for 45 days. Card is a collection tool. It gets you paid faster.

The fee is real — and smaller than the wait.  Net of tax, operational savings, and your cost of capital, the sticker MDR isn't the number that matters.

For the supplier decision-maker — net cost of acceptance, DSO, cost of capital, working capital.

Net cost, not sticker MDR Paid in days Zero bad debt on card A collection tool

The reframe

You know what else has a fee? Carrying a receivable 30, 60, or 90 days.

The card fee is the number everyone reacts to. The carrying cost is the number nobody puts on the page. When you do — net of tax, the collection time you get back, and your cost of capital — the sticker MDR stops being the decision. Net terms are a 0% loan you're extending to a buyer who can afford to pay you today.

What you're picturing

The sticker MDR

A processing fee you assume is 3% or 4%, viewed in isolation, that "eats into thin margins." It's the only number on the page — so it wins the argument by default.

The fee you assume~3%
  • Often far below the assumed rate on commercial spend.
  • Tax-deductible — the after-tax number is lower still.
What it actually nets to

The net cost of acceptance

MDR minus the carrying cost you eliminate, the collection time you stop spending, the bad debt that goes to zero, and the credit line you stop drawing. On commercial card terms, that net can land in the low double-digit basis points.

Sticker MDR~3%
Net cost after tax + savings + WACC12–82 bps
  • Paid in 1–2 days instead of waiting 45 — and the cash is guaranteed.
  • No more "calling customers begging for money."

Net cost vs. cost of waiting

Put the fee next to the cost of the 0% loan you're already giving.

Here's the comparison the card fee never gets shown against — the cost of capital tied up in an unpaid invoice. The figures below are example math to show the shape of the trade, not a guarantee; your real numbers depend on your terms, tax rate, and cost of capital.

Cost of capital comparison Example math · illustrative
A "free" ACH paid on day 90What carrying that receivable costs you
284bps
Getting paid 60 days soonerThe value of the acceleration
156bps
Getting paid 45 days soonerThe value of the acceleration
117bps
Getting paid 15 days soonerThe minimum acceleration we target
39bps
Example math at ~950 bps cost of capital and ~350 bps inflation. Illustrative only — not a guarantee of results. Run your own numbers in the case for card.

Stop playing bank

You shipped the product. Why are you also financing it?

When you ship on net terms, you pay your own suppliers in 30 days and wait 45, 60, even 90 to get paid. That gap is a loan — and you're the bank, lending at 0% to a buyer who could put it on a card today. Card isn't a fee to avoid; it's how you stop carrying your buyer's receivable and stop making the awkward collection call. You get paid in days, not months.

What net terms cost

A 0% loan to your buyer, funded by your credit line at 8–12%.

What the wait costs

Collection time, bad-debt exposure, and cash you can't forecast.

What card returns

Guaranteed funds in 1–2 days, zero bad debt, no collection call.

The economics already favor the card

On net cost, card beats check and ACH outright.

This isn't our claim — it's the published economics of commercial card acceptance once you account for acceleration. The price case for card is settled; what's left is setting the program up correctly so it actually gets you paid faster.

82 bps

Net card cost when you accelerate cash 15 days at net-30 terms — versus 192–316 bps for check and ACH.

Source: Visa Commercial Solutions © 2023
12 bps

Net card cost on longer terms, where the acceleration is worth more — still a fraction of the 192–316 bps cost of check and ACH.

Source: Visa Commercial Solutions © 2023

Net cost of card vs. check and ACH — on cost alone, card wins. The gap is the carrying cost you stop paying.

Check & ACH192–316 bps
Net card cost12–82 bps
Source: Visa Commercial Solutions © 2023

The objections, answered straight

The three things every supplier says first.

"The fee is too high."

It's the sticker MDR you're reacting to, not the net cost. Subtract the carrying cost you eliminate, the collection time you get back, the bad debt that goes to zero, and the tax deduction — and the net lands in basis points, not percent. The fee is real; it's just smaller than the wait it replaces.

"We prefer ACH or wire."

ACH can be reversed and the timing still drifts. Card pays you in 1–2 days, the funds are guaranteed, and the remittance data reconciles cleanly against the invoice. You're trading a slow, uncertain "free" for fast, certain, and self-reconciling.

"Our margins are too thin."

That's the reason to do it, not avoid it. Card is a collection tool — it gets you paid faster, kills bad debt, and frees the cash you're borrowing against. On a thin margin, eliminating a single write-off and the carrying cost matters more, not less.

Built for the decision-maker

A one-page answer, not a payments project.

You don't want another system to learn or a long integration to manage. The case for card is a single sheet of net-cost math on your terms — here's what you'll pay, here's what you'll save, here's how fast you get paid. We handle the setup; you decide. See the full method on the case for card.

Card as a collection tool

Paid in days. Net cost in basis points.

  • Net cost sized on your terms, tax rate, and cost of capital
  • Guaranteed funds in 1–2 days — zero bad debt on card
  • No system to learn — we set it up on the rails you have

See the real number, not the sticker.

We'll size the net cost of acceptance on your terms, tax rate, and cost of capital — and show you how much sooner you get paid. One page, plain English, no payments project. Then you decide.

Other supplier roles